CHAIRMAN'S COUNCIL

CHAIRMAN'S COUNCIL

ADVISERS INTELLIGENCE

Why Elite Advisors Raise Fees When Everyone Else Negotiates

Week 3, Q1 2026

Jan 21, 2026
∙ Paid

When a $4 million client informed his wealth manager of a competing firm’s offer, identical services at 15 basis points less, conventional wisdom dictated a simple response: match the price or lose the relationship.

The advisor chose a third option. He raised his fees by 10 basis points.

The client remained. Within 90 days, he had referred two colleagues.

The outcome defies standard business logic, yet it reflects a growing divergence in how top-performing Wealth Advisers approach fee discussions compared with their peers. Industry data suggests this psychological approach to pricing may explain much of the widening revenue gap between elite practices and average performers.

The Hidden Cost of Negotiation

The wealth management industry has long operated on an implicit assumption: When clients resist fees, advisors should negotiate. The practice appears rational, a modest discount seems preferable to losing an account entirely.

Research into Adviser behavior patterns suggests otherwise.

Fee negotiations, even successful ones, create lasting consequences that extend well beyond the immediate conversation. Clients who secure discounts demonstrate measurably different behavior patterns going forward. They consolidate fewer outside assets. They provide fewer referrals. They prove more likely to entertain competing offers in subsequent years.

The mechanism appears to be psychological rather than economic. When advisors negotiate fees, they inadvertently communicate three messages: that initial pricing reflected positioning rather than value, that their services are interchangeable with competitors, and that resistance produces rewards.

That final lesson proves particularly costly. Clients who successfully negotiate once tend to negotiate perpetually, and share their success with others who become clients expecting similar treatment.

Elite practitioners have largely abandoned fee negotiation for this reason. The short-term revenue preservation, they argue, destroys the positioning that justifies premium pricing over time.

CHAIRMAN'S COUNCIL is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


The Advisor’s Internal Game

Interviews with high-performing wealth managers reveal a consistent theme: their fee conversations succeed largely because of what happens before any words are exchanged.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Chairman's Council.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Chairman's Council · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture